|
Days Full of Possibilities
by R. Brian Stanfield
Just as we meet limits in the midst of life, we also find possibility, the
undiluted freedom to create and live our lives. Everyday the sun rises is a new
day full of possibilities. We do not have to approach today in the same way as
we approached yesterday. Every week is a new week with a new set of tasks,
demands, adventures, any of which reveal brand new possibilities.
This can be especially clear in a health crisis: when the doctor says you
have three years to live, or one year, or a few months. There is still
possibility. We have all seen people appraise their situation, affirm it, and
then decide what they want to accomplish in their remaining time.
The exploits of young people like Canadian Terry Fox both thrill and beckon
to people. Cancer had left him with a wooden leg, but he saw he could use the
wooden leg as a gimmick to raise money for cancer research. Starting in
Newfoundland, he walked on his wooden leg half way across Canada before his
cancer caught up with him. Another young man, Rick Hanson, a paraplegic who used
to be an athlete, pushed himself across the 5000-mile width of Canada in a
wheelchair, and subsequently around the world, on behalf of spinal-cord
research. Imagine all the people who told them, "You can't do this."
The possibilities are endless. And it is the same with the creativity that is
breaking loose all over. People who are unhappy with current economics are
creating their local trading systems; those who have become disenchanted with
the nine-to-five job are creating new cottage industries at home; some very rich
people, like Ted Turner, are working to give a lot of their money back to the
world where it is needed, for the United Nations or to create open societies.
Camcorders document abuses of power and become a force for emancipation.
More people seem to be setting out to do the impossible. Some sail round the
world on their own. Mount Everest has a garbage problem on its summit, through
the sheer numbers of successful climbers; even fifteen-year olds are preparing
to climb it. US and Russian spacecraft have cooperated in space exploration
further into our galaxy. Everything is up for grabs and open-ended at the same
time. Just make up your mind what you want and start experimenting or pushing.
If you want a child, but you think getting married is for the birds, you can
arrange for a donor. If you're the kind of person who is always getting lost,
you can buy yourself a small global positioning instrument to tell you where you
are.
We easily become intoxicated with the miracles of technology that keep
emerging, but technological advancement on its own without an ethical framework
can be counter-productive. Is the integral development of the human being
advancing at the same pace? What are we going to do about the hundreds of
nuclear devices rusting out in the Soviet Union? Who is taking responsibility
for all that nuclear waste? It is one thing for the wunderkind to create these
technological wonders and monsters. It is another to think through a long-term
plan for them. We have marvelled at the wonder of test-tube babies and the
creation of embryos. But more than 25, 000 frozen embryos are waiting in US
laboratories for people to decide about their future: to use them or trash them.
It seems that there are big decisions waiting to be made in every one of the
arenas we have mentioned. The lucid ones know that the future comes to all of us
as crushing demand. It will constantly call on us to attempt the impossible.
There was a time in my life when I became a fanatic amateur futurist and read
every book I could find on new things being developed and the kind of future
they would create. One day I spouted on about it all to some friends over a
beer. I told them that you know, all this flesh and bone could disappear and we
could turn into a set of more efficient artificial prostheses, including heart
and brain. As soon as I had said it, one of my friends asked with some feeling,
"You think being a tin man would be great? Is that the kind of human being
you want us to become?" I said that I had not thought about it personally,
to which he responded, "Look, Brian, it's fine to get excited about all
this, but someone's got to take responsibility for all these new inventions. We
need to get to a consensus on this quickly, or certain scientists will have us
all clanking around like tin men. It is fine to get intrigued about the many
different forms of marriage and partnership today and the end of the nuclear
family, but we've got to decide what form of the family is really going to care
for people, children and society?" I said nothing further, just sipped my
beer. His point was too obviously true to deny.
There are so many other cases: what shall we do about the Palestinian-Israeli
impasse? What needs to happen in the former Yugoslavia? What is the key to
turning Central, West, and East Africa around? How do we get a truly
participatory governing system here, in which the economic, political and
cultural dimensions of society are held in balance, without the cronyism between
business and government ? How can we enable full rights for Aboriginal people?
How are we going to change schools into places where people really learn how to
live life and make a life? Who is going to recreate vital local health systems?
Local community? Who are going to be the champions of the environment?
Everywhere we look we see what needs to be done. Nothing has to remain the way
it is.
It is the same with us. We can become whatever we decide. We are in charge of
creating our own future (although we are not in control.) Many of the limits we
create for ourselves are just that-self-imposed limits. In Chicken
Soup for the Soul at Work, Canfield and Co. give the example of Azie
Taylor Morton, past United States Treasurer. Her mother was deaf and could not
speak. She didn't know who her father was. Her first job was picking cotton.
Later in her life she witnessed to possibility:
Nothing has to remain the way it is, if that's not the way a person wants
it to be. It isn't luck, and it isn't circumstances, and it isn't being born
a certain way that causes a person's future to become what it becomes.
Nothing has to remain the way it is, if that's not the way a person wants it
to be. All a person has to do to change a situation that brings unhappiness
or dissatisfaction is answer the question: How do I want this situation to
become? Then the person must commit totally to personal actions that carry
them there.
Whoopi Goldberg made a similar witness in The
Whoopi Goldberg Book. She says she looks on acting as such a joyous
thing because it is shot through with possibility. Anything can happen:
As I write this, I'm appearing eight times a week, on Broadway, in a part
originally written for a man, but you'd never know, right? If you come to a
thing with no preconceived notions of what that thing is, the whole world
can be your canvas. Just dream it, and you can make it so. I believed a
little girl could rise from a single parent household in the Manhattan
projects, start a single-parent household of her own, struggle through seven
years of welfare and odd jobs, and still wind up making movies. So yeah, I
think anything is possible. I know it because I have lived it. I know it
because I have seen it. I have witnessed things the ancients would have
called miracles, but they are not miracles. They are the projects of
someone's dream, and they happen as the result of hard work.
We hear of such examples, and say, "Yes, I see that. Yes, that's
wonderful for them. But my situation is different, you see." Now our
problem is not insecurity or emptiness, but overwhelming possibility. The
problem is that life is too full, like a double-yoked egg. To decide which way
our life is going to go, which ditch we are going to dig, which issue to aim it
at, seems absurd, when there are so many. ICA Canada director Duncan Holmes
tells about when he was a kid and ice cream parlors sold 12 varieties of ice
cream -- that was something. His mother took him in and invited him to pick an
ice cream. Confounded by the magnificence of all the offerings, he could opt
only for the tried and true vanilla. Upon hearing "vanilla", his
mother said loudly, dogmatically and in a tone that would brook no opposition:
"Duncan, you are not going to stand there and choose vanilla. I simply will
not allow it! Choose something different!"
There's a bookstore in Toronto, called appropriately The World's Biggest
Bookstore, over half a block big and two stories tall. It is absolutely packed
with books. To decide to buy anything there is a real achievement. Often I walk
around for two hours and leave empty-handed -- just can't decide; it's too much.
Many of those who have made it in life had to break through impossible
blocks, but they trusted in the possibility in life and did the impossible. A
well-known recording company wrote in a note to the Beatles: "We don't like
your sound, and guitar music is on the way out." Fortunately, the Beatles
persevered. A well-known computer company said to Steve Jobs when he sought
funding for Apple computers, "Hey, you haven't gone through college
yet." English novelist John Creasey got 753 rejection slips before he
published 564 books. Many of the great social reformers, from Emily Pankhurst to
Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, were imprisoned for their pains. But that only made
their determination stronger.
Escape Patterns
In this situation we tend to say, "Too much". Faced with
overwhelming possibility and overwhelming demand, the question is "What do
I?" What am I going to do with my whole life? Which of the many possible
furrows am I going to plough? Which social demand will I commit to? This is not
an economic question related to job or income, but a question of one's
historical thrust. But as soon as we ask it, we want to take a nap. Like
Scarlett O'Hara in Gone With the Wind, we tend to say, "I'll think about
that tomorrow." Or, "I need more data to be able to decide. It's not
all that clear. And after all, there's no urgency; I have my whole life before
me." Or, when we do assign ourselves time to think about our future, we sit
down with fingers on the computer keys, and nothing comes.
Yet, even as we postpone the decision, our life clock is ticking away, one
heart beat at a time ker BOOM, ker BOOM, ker BOOM; life and death and life and
death; decide, decide, decide. Samuel Beckett, in Waiting
for Godot, puts such delaying tactics into the mouths of Vladimir and
Estragon:
Vladimir: Well? What do we do?
Estragon: Don't let's do anything. It's safer… Let's wait until we know
exactly how we stand.
Everyone gets only once around the clock in this lifetime. No one gets a
second chance. This is it. Even as we postpone the decision, our lives are
ticking away. We long for some quick solution to put an end to the demand on our
lives, an end to our own procrastination. The irony is that when possibility
breaks out all round us, we find ourselves longing for death. Camus put it this
way in The
Myth of Sisyphus:
There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is
suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to answering
the fundamental question of philosophy. All the rest -- whether or not the
world has three dimensions or the mind has nine or twelve categories -- are
games. One must first answer... One must follow and understand this fatal
game that leads from lucidity in the face of existence to flight from
light.... Killing yourself is merely confessing that life is too much for
you.
There are many ways of committing suicide beside the drug overdose, slashed
wrists, or hanging. I had a friend, a brilliant guy with a Ph.D. in microbiology
and too much money, who slept about the same amount of time as a cat: sixteen
hours a day. The rest of the time he drove all over the place in his car with no
shortage of energy.
We flee from the question of Who am I? by hiding from it. We escape from the
question, what do I?, by floating. It's as if we were up there with those
round-the-world balloonists. We look down at the passing scenes on the world
below. The balloon passes over people picking up food from garbage dumps, and we
exclaim, "Gee, that's terrible -- someone really ought to do something
about that!" But the balloon moves on, and we see the forests in the Amazon
burning, and we say, "Look at that: good rainforest going up in smoke --
that's ecologically indefensible. Someone ought to stop that!" But the wind
takes the balloon on and now it's over what remains of Yugoslavian communities:
we catch scenes of internecine strife; people digging mass graves and shoveling
the dead into them; explosions, machine gun fire, old and young being cut down.
"Terrible! Shocking!" is our response. "They need someone to take
responsibility for that situation." Then the balloon moves on, and we
witness slave labor and the terrible living conditions of the New York garment
workers, but the balloon moves inexorably on and on. It never lights down. Just
floats and floats, on, and on round the world, until maybe it just flops down in
the ocean and sinks.
Cynicism is another escape. We denigrate life, hoping to excuse ourselves
from serious engagement, because "life is really a pile" or
"people are just no damn good you can't trust anyone these days." Or,
show up at a meeting with a "grenade" in our back pocket. As soon as
it looks like a creative proposal might go somewhere, out comes the grenade to
bring the creative flow of energy to a grinding halt: "Hey, we tried that
three years ago, and it didn't work!"
Yet each of us has the chance to live one great life and die one great death.
Life is like one of those Roman candles: we light the Roman candle and someone
sings out, "Hey, shoot it this way!" And we turn round and aim it in
that direction, until someone else says, "Hey, over here!" And we
shoot it that way, and another way. Then someone says, "Shoot it over
here!" And we turn the candle that way. Suddenly, oops! No more sparks. The
candle is finished. Like that Roman candle, a human is just a burst of energy.
The question is always where to direct it.
So each of us is faced with the option: Do I choose my destiny and grasp it
every day of my life or do I spend my life waiting for it?
The Discipline of Lucidity
Lucidity about reality is not like learning to ride a bike: once learned, we
never forget. Lucidity as a stance that has to be recapitulated day after day,
so that we are not being constantly smashed by the way life comes to us. Hence
the need to discipline our lucidity. We need to know how to stay grounded in our
actual situation, and live in reality day by day. This is no snack, as T. S.
Eliot reminds us: "Human kind cannot stand very much reality."
Some people I know start each day like this after climbing out of bed:
Life is never the way we want it.
We refuse to accept its promise.
Nevertheless we are free to live.
Be it so.
Tracy Goss has this summary:
Life does not turn out the way it "should".
Nor does life turn out the way it shouldn't.
Life turns out the way it does.
These are good mantras to use every now and then. These rituals can be the
equivalent of rubbing the sleep out of our eyes. They remind us of both the
limits and the possibility that life is and set one's course for the day. I know
people who start the day by sitting on the floor and doing some yoga exercises.
Some people go to Mass to rehearse the way life is; in monasteries, they make
sure they get their stance straight by chanting the office of Lauds at 3 a.m.
These are highly specific ways of starting the day. For some of us, the act of
taking a shower may be the ritual by which we say to ourselves, "I'm going
to stay awake today to life as it is". Other people sit down fully dressed
to make out their "Do list" for the day and state their intention to
remain grounded in the realities of their situation.
There are many other ways to keep ourselves grounded in reality. One is
exposing ourselves to the full spectrum of reality through the movies we watch,
the news we decide to listen to or read, the places we go. If we note that the
last half-dozen movies we have seen are all romances, we might want to try a
serious drama. If we notice that our TV watching focuses a lot on talk shows, we
might want to watch the six o'clock news for a while.
Others like to immerse themselves in the experience of the four seasons: the
burst of new possibility in the spring; the full flowering and growth in the
summer; the wonderful colors and browning in the fall, the cold and death of
winter, followed by the quickening and then the explosion of life in the spring.
This for them is a rehearsal of life as it is.
Life is full of things that ease this sense of being in "the big
squeeze" -- alcohol, drugs, possessions, illusions -- that take away our
sense of limits or our belief in possibility. This is why lucidity is a
discipline that every leader needs. It is never acquired once and for all, but
has to be rehearsed every day.
The final question here is how we relate to life: that is, how we name it. We
all know people who say: "Life is a bitch and then you die." We can
relate to the crunch as cynics, or romantics, or we can relate to it as good and
decide to dance the dance of life.
This
article is excerpted from The
Courage to Lead, ©2000, by R. Brian Stanfield. Reprinted with
permission of the publisher, New Society Publishers, Canada. http://www.newsociety.com
Info/Order
this book.
Another book by this author:
The Art of Focused Conversation:
100 Ways to Access Group Wisdom in the Workplace.
Info/Order
this book.
About the Author
R. Brian Stanfield is the Director of Research at The Canadian Institute of
Cultural Affairs and the author of The
Art of Focused Conversation as well as of The
Courage to Lead. He lives in Toronto, Ontario. The Canadian Institute
for Cultural Affairs is a non-profit with a presence in 48 countries;
for over 45 years, it has worked in organizational development, adult and child
education, community development, and methods of social change.
Printer Friendly Page |