|
|
The
Art of Non-Violence
& Dog Training
by
Paul Owens
with Norma Eckroate
Part
II (continued
from Part I)
Responding
Versus Reacting to Your Dog
Sometimes
all that is necessary to tilt the scales
toward nonviolence during training is simply
to become aware of the obvious. A few years
ago a couple called me to do a consultation
for a dog that was exhibiting aggressive
behavior. When I arrived at the home, Lucky
was locked in the basement. I learned the wife
was a psychiatrist and the husband was a
psychologist. This couple knew more about
operant and classical conditioning than I
could ever hope to know in this lifetime. Yet,
there I was setting up a behavior modification
program for them and their dog, which was, in
principle, similar to the ones they design and
implement every day of the week for human
beings! Fortunately, the light bulb went
off in their heads and they quickly realized
they had not been using their expertise with
their own dog. They were able to implement my
suggestions with great results. A few weeks
later when I checked back, Lucky was well on
her way to becoming a well-mannered member of
society.
Like
this couple, all of us have blocks in our
awareness. It’s as if we sometimes forget to
“connect the dots”. Often it’s
just a matter of finding the trigger to
release and remember what we already know. To
do this, we have to pause before we act, and
learn to respond rather than react.
“Reacting” denotes an emotionally-based
knee-jerk behavior to a particular situation.
On the other hand, a “response” means we
bring all of our wisdom, creativity,
intuition, and emotion to the situation. Why
learn to respond rather than react? For
one thing, when you stop and consider what you
are about to do with your dog, you are able to
focus on how to deal with the problem rather
than the symptom.
Let’s
say a dog is barking at the mail carrier
walking toward the house. The knee-jerk
reaction is to respond to the symptom, which
is the barking, rather than the cause. Most
people never think about what is causing the
dog to bark; he might be excited, he might be
afraid, he might simply be saying hello. In
essence, he perceives that he’s doing his
job. In most cases, people deal with the
barking by yelling at the dog, hitting him
with a newspaper, or jerking him on the leash
to get him to stop.
Regardless
of the reason the dog was initially barking,
he now associates the mail carrier walking
toward him as a danger because of the bad
things that happened to him when he barked at
that person. So now the dog has a growing
aggression problem towards people in uniforms
walking towards the house. Imagine, on the
other hand, if every time the mail carrier
showed up and the dog started barking, you
interrupted him with a phrase like “Who’s
that” and then gave him treat. You will have
ended the barking and the dog will have
associated the mail carrier with something
positive. So, by using this nonviolent,
positive approach, you’ve stopped the
barking and, in the process, you’ve made the
dog more social.
Every
dog deserves respect. And that respect
includes being considerate. You should do your
best to find out why a dog is doing what he is
doing before responding. Otherwise, it is easy
to inadvertently fly off the handle and react
in a way that might harm the dog and actually
compound the behavioral problem. Reacting
blocks respect; responding fosters respect.
Consideration
also includes the recognition that every dog
learns at his or her own rate. People often
ask me how long it takes to train a dog. The
answer is — it takes as long as it takes. In
many ways, training a dog is like raising a
child. No parent would ever expect a child to
learn to behave perfectly within three months
or six months or even three years. Yet many
people expect a dog to learn to sit or walk by
their side reliably with just a few days’
training or after only a few sessions. It just
doesn’t happen that way.
What
Is Violence?
Everyone
looks at the world differently. And we look at
dogs differently. To many of us a dog is a
loved, cherished being with her own distinct
personality. Our dogs are members of our
families and our partners in life. They teach
us patience and love, and allow us to see
these qualities reflected back when we look at
them. Yes, to some, dogs are mirrors of our
most exemplary human characteristics. Their
presence increases our feelings of self-worth
and help to heal us emotionally and
physically. In their role as service dogs,
they help us stand and see, both figuratively
and literally. They tell us when the phone is
ringing or when someone is at the door. They
predict epileptic seizures and can even smell
diseases — and so much more.
To
others, a dog is an extension of machismo;
if a dog is big, tough, and mean, it must mean
that the dog’s owner is that way too.
Finally, in some people’s eyes, dogs are
simply possessions, which are disposable. Many
people simply give up on dogs with behavior
problems, such as eliminating in the house or
excessive barking, and drop them off at the
shelter. In the United States alone,
desensitization, ignorance, and superstition
are significant causes of more than four
million dogs being put to death annually —
not to mention the cruelty and the suffering
of countless others.
People
have dropped out of my classes because, as one
guy put it, “I need to work with a more
‘hands-on’ approach.” Read “jerk
and shake” in that comment. “He’s a
rottweiler”, another guy said after
literally punching his dog in the face. “He
can take it.” I reported the man for
this abuse. I felt sorry for the poor dog.
Violence
is any behavior or thought that is harmful and
stops growth — emotionally, physically, and
mentally. Nonviolence is the opposite — any
behavior or thought that promotes and fosters
self-awareness, health, growth, and safety in
these areas. All dogs are individuals with
their own unique personalities just like us
humans. And every situation in which the two
of us interact is unique for that time and
place. It is up to each one of us to determine
what is violent, and what is not, at that
moment in time. This holds true for behavior
directed towards animals, the environment,
and, as common sense dictates, ourselves. It
takes lots of practice.
Here
are some examples, a frame of mind, to clarify
the differences, and help you draw the
nonviolence/violence line in the sand. To
interrupt a dog that is climbing on the dining
room table or chewing an electric cord, you
can distract him with sound and motion, and
ask him to do something else. Can you see the
difference between interrupting him and
frightening him? In the same vein, you
can encourage your dog to sit, or you can
force and intimidate him by jerking, hitting,
shocking, or shaking. You can create an
environment so your dog learns by her
successes, or you can punish him. Does that
mean there is no anger in the training of
dogs? Let’s face it, we’re human
beings and anger is a human emotion. Every now
and then, we humans get angry.
But
there is a difference between ethical anger
and violent anger. Ethical anger is anger in
which emotion is expressed appropriately and
with full awareness of the consequences of
that expression. It means expressing oneself
without causing harm. In its best expression,
anger is a prod to positive change. Violent
anger has no regard for consequence. At those
rare times when you find yourself angry,
reward-based dog training takes the violence
out of that anger. This means that in no
situation whatsoever do you ever harm your
dog. And that takes awareness.
A
nonviolent approach doesn’t victimize. It is
a proactive approach in which the nonviolent
principles of love, respect, and compassion
are foremost in your mind. A nonviolent
approach also means not taking on the role of
a victim, although there are times when we
must put ourselves in harm’s way to protect
or care for a loved one or for a greater good.
For example, Gandhi practiced what he called
peaceful resistance in India’s struggle for
independence. The point is, a commitment to
nonviolence doesn’t preclude using our good
old common sense, as well as wisdom, humor,
and other nonaversive conflict resolution
methods. We are the intelligent,
compassionate, intuitive, creative species,
are we not? Certainly we can figure out
how to shape a dog’s behavior without the
use of aversive methods.
Aversive
training methods are not only harmful to
animals; I believe they are at least part of
the reason that animals sometimes exhibit
violent behavior toward humans. According to
recent statistics, there were 4.5 million dog
bites in the United States last year, and 75
percent of the victims were children. In fact,
dog bites are the leading cause of children
being taken to the hospital.
The
Cycle of Violence
So,
why do people still continue to harm or
threaten to harm their dogs? There are
three major reasons: 1) it’s
always been done this way, 2) the sense
or need of the person to be in physical
control of a situation, or 3) wanting to
punish the dog. If a person is using aversive
methods with a dog because “it’s always
been done this way”, habituation and
familiarity have set in. Changing things can
be a threat to the status quo. To less secure
individuals it also might mean that they would
have to admit they had been violent in the
past. This would be like looking in a mirror
and seeing themselves as different from who
they thought they were. Scary! The other
reasons people continue to use harmful
training methods — their need to be in
physical control and wanting to punish the dog
— are usually associated with anger and
frustration. As I said earlier, anger has no
place in dog training. It shuts off and
restricts wisdom, creativity, and intuition.
Both the person and the dog suffer. To quote
from the Bhagavad Gita: “From
unfulfilled desire comes frustration; from
frustration, anger; from anger, ruin.”
The
tendency to use domination techniques —
violent force or the threat of force — is
ingrained early in life. For example, whenever
a child sees another person demonstrating
dominating behavior, she learns that we
“win” by being bigger, stronger, and
tougher. In nonviolent dog training there is
no “winning” because there is no
competition.
When
we use aversive training methods instead of
nonviolent alternatives, we risk ensnaring our
dogs and ourselves in a downward spiral of
aggression, and we desensitize ourselves to
the higher aspects of who we are as humans.
There was a recent article in the paper about
a fourteen-year-old girl who had just killed a
deer for sport. An accompanying photo showed
the dead animal strapped to the hood of her
father’s car. The girl was asked, “How did
you feel when you killed the deer?”
She said, “Well, when I killed my first one
last year I felt pretty bad. Now it’s easier
and I don’t think about it at all.”
Education is the key to creating awareness.
Studies
have shown that humans who are violent toward
animals often extend that behavior and become
violent towards other humans. In the last
decade, a number of news headlines have
repeated the same tragic facts in story after
story — a child who exhibited violence
toward animals had turned to murdering people.
Reward-based
dog training, through its nonviolent approach,
promotes compassion and encourages our true
nature as sensitive, empathic, loving beings.
It acts as a bridge and fosters
human-to-animal and human-to-human
nonviolence.
|
PAPER INCENSE:
Paper
soaked in the resins of
frankincense, myrrh, and benzoin --
when the paper incense
is burned, the odor removing properties of the
resins are released.
Other
fragrances also available.
For more info visit
InnerSelf's
Mighty Natural Marketplace
|
|
|
Categories |
|
|
|
Most
Popular |
|
|
|
Community Links |
|
|
|
Latest
News |
|
|
|
Donation |
|
|
|
Subscribe Free
|
|
|
|
InnerSelf Market |
|
|
|
Advertiser |
|
|
|
Advertiser |
|
|
|
Syndication |
|
|
 |